OpenAI Unveils Defense Strategy in Trade Secrets Lawsuit

The tech world is abuzz with news that OpenAI has filed a motion to dismiss Apple's trade secrets lawsuit, along with newly filed exhibits, revealing the company's legal defense strategy.

Key Points in OpenAI's Defense Strategy

• OpenAI argues that Apple's own security practices and offboarding procedures weaken its claim that the information qualifies as legally protected trade secrets.
• The AI company points to Apple's use of personal iCloud accounts for work and failure to properly revoke access after employees left the company.
• OpenAI submitted text message records showing an Apple manager remained logged into the personal iCloud account of a former Apple engineer after he left the company.

OpenAI's defense strategy centers around the idea that former Apple employees were not stealing trade secrets, but rather trying to assist their prior colleagues in their new roles at OpenAI.

Apple's complaint accuses OpenAI of orchestrating a scheme to obtain confidential hardware information from former Apple engineers.

• OpenAI argues that Apple failed to properly secure its systems when employees departed, creating confusion and unwanted access issues that Apple now characterizes as theft.
• The AI company also accuses Apple of omitting the consequences of its own "inexplicable information-management practices" from its original complaint.

• OpenAI argues that Apple hasn't specified which "trade secrets" or confidential components were allegedly stolen, referring to them instead as "generic categories of the product-development process—such as component manufacturing, product testing, vendor and supplier relationships, and distribution channels."

• The AI company's filing posits that Apple is using this lawsuit to slow down its competitor from innovating in AI-powered hardware, rather than focusing on its own product plans.

OpenAI argues that it has no use, need, or desire for Apple's trade secrets, but rather is building something entirely new and different from anything at Apple.

• The motion argues that Apple should not be permitted to use a baseless and pretextual lawsuit to make up for its shortcomings in the market for talent and retaining its employees, and its failures to integrate AI into its products.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.